Monday, July 24, 2006

Contingency in the believer's life

At connexions, Kim has gained valuable insights from chronic illness:
As Job discovered, the recognition that anything can happen - and, as Job’s friends didn’t, that from this fact no conclusions can be drawn - is crucial to the life of faith. You know the phrase “with God all things are possible”? I now understand it to mean, not that God can do anything, but that nothing is necessary. Creation is grace.
Kim does a find job of expressing the place of contingency in the life of the believer:
Above all: how totally misconceived is the relentless search for explanation, and how utterly repugnant is the notion that there is a reason for suffering, that suffering is for something, let alone that it is sent, as a trial perhaps, or worse, as a punishment. I am more convinced than ever that theodicies are not only inherently futile essays, they are indeed potentially (how ironic!) evil projects, in intention justifications of God, in practice demonstrations of human pride, projects that satisfy our piety at the cost of both our moral sensibility and the moral integrity of God. The only theologically appropriate theodicy is the anti-theodicy of the cross - and at the cross one does not speak, one falls silent in wonder and praise.
The irony of theodicy. Yes.

5 Comments:

Blogger Wes Messamore said...

I don't understand. What again is the problem with theodicies?

3:51 PM, July 24, 2006  
Blogger Milton Stanley said...

Well, you might do better asking Kim, but as I interpret her ideas, theodicy is too often used to provide a certainty that God doesn't seem to want us to have in certain situations. As we learn in Job, we can't always know why a particular episode of suffering comes to be.

4:20 PM, July 24, 2006  
Blogger Wes Messamore said...

Well I'd argue that while it may not be proper to always try to find some explanation for evil (which is why it's very appropriate for her to reference Job, since God gave him no explanation for the evil he endured and since God frankly didn't owe him one), I tend to think of theodicies more as arguments that explain to critics how it can be that a loving and all-powerful God can exist alongside a universe that contains evil. A theodicy is the affirmation that God is loving and righteous and good and all-powerful even despite the evil all around us. I'd argue that much of the Old Testament is a theodicy in some sense. It's writers were very nearly obsessed with evil and with assuring that even with all the evil their people had to face, God was good and had a good and perfect will for them.

11:14 PM, July 30, 2006  
Blogger Milton Stanley said...

WEM: Yes, I agree that a general theodicy is good and even necessary: God is good despite evil in the world. The problem comes in the specific cases: why did my sister die young, why did my mother get cancer, why am I suffering this particular affliction. I far too often hear the glib response that God wants it that way when in fact God may not.

3:05 PM, July 31, 2006  
Blogger Wes Messamore said...

Agreed!

1:11 PM, August 01, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home